Chinese Missile could shift Pacific power balance

歡迎會員在此言論自由論壇發表任何題材評論文章。題材跨越地域界限, 希望全球各地會員就當地發生的事與物, 踴躍發表你的評論。讓全球每個角落會員都能分享你言而有物、高水平的評論。會員發表的評論文章屬個人意見, 不代表本網站立場。
samuel
文章: 2017
註冊時間: 週五 8月 06, 2010 1:29 pm

Chinese Missile could shift Pacific power balance

文章samuel » 週五 8月 06, 2010 1:41 pm

Missile could shift Pacific power balance

In this July 25, 2010 photo, crew of the USS George
Washington line up on the deck as the supercarrier ?
ABOARD THE USS GEORGE WASHINGTON ?Nothing projects U.S. global air and sea
power more vividly than supercarriers. Bristling with fighter jets that can
reach deep into even landlocked trouble zones, America's virtually invincible
carrier fleet has long enforced its dominance of the high seas.
China may soon put an end to that.
U.S. naval planners are scrambling to deal with what analysts say is a
game-changing weapon being developed by China ?an unprecedented carrier-killing
missile called the Dong Feng 21D that could be launched from land with enough
accuracy to penetrate the defenses of even the most advanced moving aircraft
carrier at a distance of more than 1,500 kilometers (900 miles).

The USS George Washington supercarrier recently deployed off
North Korea in a high-profile show of U.S. sea power. AP Tokyo News Editor Eric
Talmadge was aboard the carrier, and filed this report.
___
Analysts say final testing of the missile could come as soon as the end of this
year, though questions remain about how fast China will be able to perfect its
accuracy to the level needed to threaten a moving carrier at sea.
The weapon, a version of which was displayed last year in a Chinese military
parade, could revolutionize China's role in the Pacific balance of power,
seriously weakening Washington's ability to intervene in any potential conflict
over Taiwan or North Korea. It could also deny U.S. ships safe access to
international waters near China's 11,200-mile (18,000-kilometer) -long
coastline.
While a nuclear bomb could theoretically sink a carrier, assuming its user was
willing to raise the stakes to atomic levels, the conventionally-armed Dong Feng
21D's uniqueness is in its ability to hit a powerfully defended moving target
with pin-point precision.
The Chinese Defense Ministry did not immediately respond to the AP's request for
a comment.
Funded by annual double-digit increases in the defense budget for almost every
year of the past two decades, the Chinese navy has become Asia's largest and has
expanded beyond its traditional mission of retaking Taiwan to push its sphere of
influence deeper into the Pacific and protect vital maritime trade routes.
"The Navy has long had to fear carrier-killing capabilities," said Patrick
Cronin, senior director of the Asia-Pacific Security Program at the nonpartisan,
Washington-based Center for a New American Security. "The emerging Chinese
antiship missile capability, and in particular the DF 21D, represents the first
post-Cold War capability that is both potentially capable of stopping our naval
power projection and deliberately designed for that purpose."
Setting the stage for a possible conflict, Beijing has grown increasingly vocal
in its demands for the U.S. to stay away from the wide swaths of ocean ?
covering much of the Yellow, East and South China seas ?where it claims
exclusivity.
It strongly opposed plans to hold U.S.-South Korean war games in the Yellow Sea
off the northeastern Chinese coast, saying the participation of the USS George
Washington supercarrier, with its 1,092-foot (333-meter) flight deck and 6,250
personnel, would be a provocation because it put Beijing within striking range
of U.S. F-18 warplanes.
The carrier instead took part in maneuvers held farther away in the Sea of
Japan. U.S. officials deny Chinese pressure kept it away, and say they will not be told
by Beijing where they can operate.
"We reserve the right to exercise in international waters anywhere in the
world," Rear Adm. Daniel Cloyd, who headed the U.S. side of the exercises, said
aboard the carrier during the maneuvers, which ended last week.
But the new missile, if able to evade the defenses of a carrier and of the
vessels sailing with it, could undermine that policy.
"China can reach out and hit the U.S. well before the U.S. can get close enough
to the mainland to hit back," said Toshi Yoshihara, an associate professor at
the U.S. Naval War College. He said U.S. ships have only twice been that
vulnerable ?against Japan in World War II and against Soviet bombers in the
Cold War.
Carrier-killing missiles "could have an enduring psychological effect on U.S.
policymakers," he e-mailed to The AP. "It underscores more broadly that the U.S.
Navy no longer rules the waves as it has since the end of World War II. The
stark reality is that sea control cannot be taken for granted anymore."
Yoshihara said the weapon is causing considerable consternation in Washington,
though ?with attention focused on land wars in Afghanistan and Iraq ?its
implications haven't been widely discussed in public.
Analysts note that while much has been made of China's efforts to ready a
carrier fleet of its own, it would likely take decades to catch U.S. carrier
crews' level of expertise, training and experience.
But Beijing does not need to match the U.S. carrier for carrier. The Dong Feng
21D, smarter, and vastly cheaper, could successfully attack a U.S. carrier, or
at least deter it from getting too close.
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned of the threat in a speech last
September at the Air Force Association Convention.
"When considering the military-modernization programs of countries like China,
we should be concerned less with their potential ability to challenge the U.S.
symmetrically ?fighter to fighter or ship to ship ?and more with their ability
to disrupt our freedom of movement and narrow our strategic options," he said.
Gates said China's investments in cyber and anti-satellite warfare, anti-air and
anti-ship weaponry, along with ballistic missiles, "could threaten America's
primary way to project power" through its forward air bases and carrier strike
groups.
The Pentagon has been worried for years about China getting an anti-ship
ballistic missile. The Pentagon considers such a missile an "anti-access,"
weapon, meaning that it could deny others access to certain areas.
The Air Force's top surveillance and intelligence officer, Lt. Gen. David
Deptula, told reporters this week that China's effort to increase anti-access
capability is part of a worrisome trend.
He did not single out the DF 21D, but said: "While we might not fight the
Chinese, we may end up in situations where we'll certainly be opposing the
equipment that they build and sell around the world."
Questions remain over when ?and if ?China will perfect the technology; hitting
a moving carrier is no mean feat, requiring state-of-the-art guidance systems,
and some experts believe it will take China a decade or so to field a reliable
threat. Others, however, say final tests of the missile could come in the next
year or two.
Former Navy commander James Kraska, a professor of international law and sea
power at the U.S. Naval War College, recently wrote a controversial article in
the magazine Orbis outlining a hypothetical scenario set just five years from
now in which a Deng Feng 21D missile with a penetrator warhead sinks the USS
George Washington.
That would usher in a "new epoch of international order in which Beijing emerges
to displace the United States."
While China's Defense Ministry never comments on new weapons before they become
operational, the DF 21D ?which would travel at 10 times the speed of sound and
carry conventional payloads ?has been much discussed by military buffs online.
A pseudonymous article posted on Xinhuanet, website of China's official news
agency, imagines the U.S. dispatching the George Washington to aid Taiwan
against a Chinese attack.
The Chinese would respond with three salvos of DF 21D, the first of which would
pierce the hull, start fires and shut down flight operations, the article says.
The second would knock out its engines and be accompanied by air attacks. The
third wave, the article says, would "send the George Washington to the bottom of
the ocean."
Comments on the article were mostly positive.

回到「公開討論區」

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 20 位訪客